home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #30 / NN_1992_30.iso / spool / comp / lang / scheme / 2724 next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-12-11  |  1.1 KB
  1. Path: sparky!uunet!congrunt!jbs
  2. From: jbs@Congruent.COM (Jeffrey Siegal)
  3. Newsgroups: comp.lang.scheme
  4. Subject: Re: How to keep track of procedures ?
  5. Message-ID: <JBS.92Dec11122857@sun1.Congruent.COM>
  6. Date: 11 Dec 92 17:28:57 GMT
  7. References: <1992Dec11.100624.1@fencer.cis.dsto.gov.au>
  8. Sender: news@Congruent.COM
  9. Organization: Congruent Corporation; New York, NY
  10. Lines: 15
  11. In-reply-to: st1pdw@fencer.cis.dsto.gov.au's message of 10 Dec 92 23:06:24 GMT
  12.  
  13. In article <1992Dec11.100624.1@fencer.cis.dsto.gov.au> st1pdw@fencer.cis.dsto.gov.au writes:
  14.  
  15.    As scheme procedures are accumulated over time it's hard to keep track
  16.    of them all so that they are readily available when you want them.
  17.  
  18. I'd say you're missing the point a bit if you really want to keep
  19. track of all the procedures.  Its like keeping track of all the
  20. numbers or strings.
  21.  
  22. If you want to keep track of the top level procedures, that is an
  23. development environment issue.  I haven't seen any Scheme environments
  24. that do a particularly good job of this (I would define what the best
  25. C environments do as reasonably good).
  26.  
  27. Jeffrey Siegal
  28.