home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!ames!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!spool.mu.edu!enterpoop.mit.edu!eru.mt.luth.se!lunic!sunic!sics.se!torkel
- From: torkel@sics.se (Torkel Franzen)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.prolog
- Subject: Re: Occurs check
- Message-ID: <TORKEL.92Dec21064735@bast.sics.se>
- Date: 21 Dec 92 05:47:35 GMT
- References: <1992Dec13.173016.8849@nntp.hut.fi> <1992Dec17.111142.24450@dcs.qmw.ac.uk>
- <24435@alice.att.com> <TORKEL.92Dec17201903@bast.sics.se>
- <24439@alice.att.com> <TORKEL.92Dec18231028@lludd.sics.se>
- <24454@alice.att.com> <TORKEL.92Dec20104928@bast.sics.se>
- <
- Sender: news@sics.se
- Organization: Swedish Institute of Computer Science, Kista
- Lines: 16
- In-Reply-To: pereira@alice.att.com's message of 20 Dec 92 22:53:14 GMT
-
- In article <24458@alice.att.com> pereira@alice.att.com (Fernando Pereira)
- writes:
-
- >It cannot be characterized by any *finite* set of first-order formulas.
-
- Finiteness is not relevant here. It is a matter of what can be
- expressed in first order logic. By compactness, any set of first order
- formulas which has a model with the Herbrand universe
- {0,s(0),s(s(0)),..} as its domain will have countable models
- containing elements different from (the interpretations of) the terms
- 0,s(0), ec. Therefore it is not correct to say that adding the
- (complete) first order identity theory of finite trees to the left of
- |- is precisely restricting the class of models under consideration
- from arbitrary first order models to finite tree models. Similarly
- for rational trees. Such a restriction cannot be achieved in first
- order logic.
-