home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!ames!pacbell.com!network.ucsd.edu!lyapunov.ucsd.edu!mbk
- From: mbk@lyapunov.ucsd.edu (Matt Kennel)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc
- Subject: Re: who should specify languages?
- Date: 12 Dec 1992 00:15:01 GMT
- Organization: Institute For Nonlinear Science, UCSD
- Lines: 33
- Message-ID: <1gbau5INN53d@network.ucsd.edu>
- References: <1992Dec10.192524.25311@newshost.lanl.gov>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: lyapunov.ucsd.edu
- X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3
-
- jlg@cochiti.lanl.gov (J. Giles) writes:
- : A few *simple* languages would be a much better programming environment
- : than one complicated language. And, programming should consist of writing
- : the algorithms and data structures appropriate to the problem at hand,
- : and then picking whichever language(s) are available and most appropriate
- : for the chosen structures.
-
- Yes. Now, here's a complaint dressed as a question.
-
- Why do language designers never consider the interface to another language
- worthy of the slightest standardization?
-
- The implementation will of course be dependent on specific languages and
- compilers, but still there is enough commonality between langauges to allow
- a basic level of interaction.
-
- It's as if they consider the language to live in a pure world of its own,
- uncontaminated by influences from the real world.
-
- For example. Why doesn't the ANSI C committees define "official" interfaces
- to FORTRAN (and Fortran) and vice versa? Neither is about to disappear next
- week. For other less common languages, this is even MORE important as
- you're likely to find library components and other necessary tools in
- languages other than your primary one.
-
- : --
- : J. Giles
-
- --
- -Matt Kennel mbk@inls1.ucsd.edu
- -Institute for Nonlinear Science, University of California, San Diego
- -*** AD: Archive for nonlinear dynamics papers & programs: FTP to
- -*** lyapunov.ucsd.edu, username "anonymous".
-