In article <1992Dec16.095946.18938@planet.bt.co.uk> njs@planet.bt.co.uk writes:
>Who are you trying to kid? I've been using this language for years and I have only seen .ccp with my Zortech stuff, and I changed that real quick. I like .cc, and having .cpp on UNIX platform which has a cpp executable might be a bit confusing for some people.
You are saying don't use .cpp because there is a cpp executable, but it's
ok to use .cc? Are you implying that you think there is no cc executable,
or what?
What is the advantage of cc over cpp? Just that it is 2 characters instead
of three? Is that a big advantage worth a flame war? The fact is that the
MS-DOS, etc., C++ compilers are being used by so many C++ programmers now
that .cpp is becoming the standard by default. Borland and Microsoft both
use it, not just Zortech. I've also seen it used by other less known brands
