home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!pipex!doc.ic.ac.uk!uknet!axion!muppet!sweep!cnc
- From: cnc@sweep.bt.co.uk (Colin Crist)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: Survey: File Extension
- Message-ID: <1992Dec16.102856.26711@muppet.bt.co.uk>
- Date: 16 Dec 92 10:28:56 GMT
- References: <78146@hydra.gatech.EDU>
- Sender: news@muppet.bt.co.uk
- Reply-To: cnc@sweep.bt.co.uk
- Organization: British Telecom
- Lines: 18
-
- In article 78146@hydra.gatech.EDU, andy@federation.gatech.edu (Andy Register) writes:
- >In article <1gb1h0INNle2@tsavo.hks.com> webb@hks.com writes:
- > >I have a survey question for you all:
- > >
- > > What extension do you believe is correct for C++ source code?
- > > Is a clear majority winner emerging? The contenders are: .C, .c
- > > and .cxx.
- >
- >don't forget .cpp for all us borland users.
-
- I've always preferred .cc
-
- Colin.
-
- -----------------------------------------------------------
- Colin Crist +44 473 648136 cnc@muppet.bt.co.uk
- BT Research Labs, Martlesham Heath, Suffolk, United Kingdom
- Standard disclaimer and all that ...
-