home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!agate!agate!matt
- From: matt@physics.berkeley.edu (Matt Austern)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: Survey: File Extensio
- Date: 14 Dec 92 20:59:01
- Organization: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory (Theoretical Physics Group)
- Lines: 16
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <MATT.92Dec14205901@physics.berkeley.edu>
- References: <389.412.uupcb@hpbs938.boi.hp.com>
- Reply-To: matt@physics.berkeley.edu
- NNTP-Posting-Host: physics.berkeley.edu
- In-reply-to: mike.quinlan%phant@hpbs938.boi.hp.com's message of 14 Dec 92 18:18:00 GMT
-
- In article <389.412.uupcb@hpbs938.boi.hp.com> mike.quinlan%phant@hpbs938.boi.hp.com (Mike Quinlan) writes:
-
- >
- > Why not use .c++ for c++ programs?
-
- Because, like .C, this is not possible for users of certain operating
- systems.
-
- There really isn't much reason that we have to standardize on any one
- extension; editors and compilers ought to be able to cope with
- whatever the user chooses.
- --
- Matthew Austern Just keep yelling until you attract a
- (510) 644-2618 crowd, then a constituency, a movement, a
- austern@lbl.bitnet faction, an army! If you don't have any
- matt@physics.berkeley.edu solutions, become a part of the problem!
-