home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.lang.ada:3627 comp.software-eng:4890
- Path: sparky!uunet!olivea!decwrl!pa.dec.com!nntpd2.cxo.dec.com!nntpd.lkg.dec.com!sousa.tay.dec.com!talent.ljo.dec.com!gibian
- From: gibian@talent.ljo.dec.com (Marc S. Gibian)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.software-eng
- Subject: Re: DoD and NIST undermining commercial CASE industry
- Message-ID: <2312@sousa.tay.dec.com>
- Date: 11 Dec 92 18:00:31 GMT
- References: <ByM75t.2s6@world.std.com> <1992Dec2.075323.3315@sei.cmu.edu> <GEOFF.92Dec3095906@wodehouse.flash.bellcore.com>
- Sender: newsa@sousa.tay.dec.com
- Reply-To: gibian@ljohub.enet.dec.com
- Followup-To: comp.lang.ada
- Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
- Lines: 20
-
-
- A couple of quick comments:
-
- 1. There is no difference between CASE tool integration and more general
- "tool" integration.
-
- 2. Digital has not been mentioned, but has a significant integration
- effort.
-
- 3. It has been a few years, but a while back I worked for a major government
- contractor. At that time, there was a US standard whose name I belive was
- "CASE" (not to be confused with CASE tools). Last I heard, there was a
- revised "CASE II" that was quite close to PCTE. This would indicate that
- this is more a Atherton/ATIS vs. other "standards" discussion.
-
- 4. What about Window's DDE/OLE?
- --
- Marc S. Gibian email: gibian@talent.ljo.dec.com
- Principal Software Engineer phone: (508) 486-6598
- Digital Equipment Corporation fax: (508) 486-6648 or (508) 486-6100
-