home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #30 / NN_1992_30.iso / spool / comp / graphics / research / 394 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-12-17  |  1.3 KB
  1. Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!gatech!mailer.cc.fsu.edu!sun13!cbmvax.cbm.commodore.com
  2. From: chrisg@cbmvax.cbm.commodore.com (Chris Green)
  3. Newsgroups: comp.graphics.research
  4. Subject: comp.graphics.research
  5. Message-ID: <11561@sun13.scri.fsu.edu>
  6. Date: 17 Dec 92 02:17:16 GMT
  7. Sender: news@sun13.scri.fsu.edu
  8. Reply-To: chrisg@cbmvax.cbm.commodore.com (Chris Green)
  9. Organization: Commodore, West Chester, PA
  10. Lines: 16
  11. Approved: murray@vs6.scri.fsu.edu
  12. X-Submissions-To: graphics@scri1.scri.fsu.edu
  13. X-Administrivia-To: graphics-request@scri1.scri.fsu.edu
  14.  
  15.  
  16.     Has anyone ever attempted to take advantage of the 
  17. "infinite-frame-rate" of raster scan devices, particularly video?
  18. What I mean by this to render your animation with the knowledge
  19. that each pixel is (for instance) 35ns later than the preceeding
  20. pixel, and that each scan-line is ~63uS later than the preceeding
  21. one. Given appropriate temporal filtering, and a general enough
  22. 4-d ray-tracer, shouldn't this provide a potential for improved
  23. quality? Is anyone familiar with any research or applications
  24. of this? I'm familiar with Don Mitchell's paper on interlace
  25. and chroma filtering for video.
  26.  
  27.  
  28. --
  29. Moderated by SCRI Vis <>           Submissions to: graphics@scri1.scri.fsu.edu
  30. Guy, John R. Murray   <> Administrivia to: graphics-request@scri1.scri.fsu.edu
  31.