home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!wupost!gumby!destroyer!news.itd.umich.edu!dabo.citi.umich.edu!rees
- From: rees@dabo.citi.umich.edu (Jim Rees)
- Newsgroups: comp.dcom.isdn
- Subject: Re: The ISDN network
- Date: 12 Dec 1992 21:06:43 GMT
- Organization: University of Michigan CITI
- Lines: 8
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <5ceb38c9.cb12@dabo.citi.umich.edu>
- References: <2932560590.0.p00136@psilink.com> <1992Dec8.180525.15003@atlastele.com> <5cdb1f76.1bc5b@pisa.citi.umich.edu> <1992Dec11.013446.24560@atlastele.com>
- Reply-To: Jim.Rees@umich.edu
- NNTP-Posting-Host: dabo.citi.umich.edu
-
- In article <1992Dec11.013446.24560@atlastele.com>, bcapps@atlastele.com (Brent Capps) writes:
-
- If you work around automated ISDN calling equipment you're going to see this
- all the time. If I have an ISDN box that automatically delivers fax or ASCII
- messages it's going to have a hell of a time determining on a per-call basis
- whether to deliver a message via analog or digital form.
-
- It won't have any trouble at all.
-