home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.databases.sybase
- Path: sparky!uunet!psinntp!kripalu!harit
- From: harit@kripalu.com
- Subject: Re: Recovering from a log segment full condition
- Message-ID: <1992Dec18.170126.269@uunet!cbmvax!xmws!kripalu>
- Sender: harit@uunet!cbmvax!xmws!kripalu
- Reply-To: harit@kripalu.com
- Organization: Kripalu Center
- References: <1992Dec16.205611.19776@spectrum.xerox.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Dec 92 17:01:26 GMT
- Lines: 33
-
- In article <1992Dec16.205611.19776@spectrum.xerox.com>
- sauvain@fandango.wrc.xerox.com (Richard Sauvain) writes:
- > I have run into the following catch-22:
- >
- > My transaction log fills up (even though I allowed more than 2X data size for
- > the transaction log), and when I try to dump the transaction log, I get an
- > error message saying that the log segment is full and I should dump the
- > transaction log. Using ALTER DATABASE to increase the size of the segment
- > allows the dump to proceed for a while, but we eventually get to the same
- > state.
- >
- > Does anyone understand what is going on here? Could it be that deleting the
- > transaction log is itself a logged operation?
- >
- > ---
- > Name: Richard Sauvain | Xerox Webster Research Center
- > Email: Sauvain@wrc.xerox.com | Mail Stop 128-27E
- > Phone: (716) 422-3379 | 800 Phillips Road
- > Fax: (716) 422-2126 | Webster, NY 14580 USA
- >
- > --------
- > The gory details:
- [Deleted]
-
- Unless you use the "with no_log" option on the dump tran command it is in fact
- logged.
-
-
- --
- Michael Allen Latta
- Kripalu Center
- harit@kripalu.com
- (413)448-3288
-