home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!UNBSJ.CA!DAVIS
- Approved-By: EDTECH Moderator <21765EDT@MSU.BITNET>
- Message-ID: <EDTECH%92121716434614@OHSTVMA.ACS.OHIO-STATE.EDU>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.edtech
- Approved: NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 16:21:00 EST
- Sender: EDTECH - Educational Technology <EDTECH@OHSTVMA.BITNET>
- From: Gary Davis <davis@UnbSJ.CA>
- Subject: Re: Computer Fees
- Lines: 65
-
- Well, Charles SUndin certainly put a cramp in the devil's advocate's
- style when he wrote that:
-
- > Gary Davis finally found me out. I would like to provide free college
- > education to the best, brightest, and most highly motivated no matter
- > what their background.
-
- Because I feel the same way.
-
- He goes on to say:
-
- > I haven'f figured out how to determine who is the best, brightest, and
- > most highly motivated 17-18 year olds.
-
- And this is problematical, sice some of the best blossom later. In the
- Province of New Brunswick, where I live, tuition is relatively high for
- Canada at about $2,100 per year. Our admission standards, as a "state"
- institution, are probably a bit on the low side, and we admit a lot of
- part time students, many of whom are single parents and "mature" (post
- 21!) students. As a result, there are a lot who get "weeded out", but a
- few stars have emerged. The last remnant of devil's advocacy I have left
- asks "what is the appropriate cutoff point between alphaerrors and beta
- errors?" This will probably be determined by budgetary pressure from the
- devil's allies, the government.
-
- > But, let's return to the subject we are supposed to be on. I received
- > an article from WISCONSIN WEEK, a UW-Madison faculty and staff
- > publication. It states, "Six Big Ten schools already charge students a
- > special technology fee, and Minnesota, Ohio State and Wisconsin are
- > seeking such a fee. Only at Northwestern, where tuition tops $15,000 a
- > year, is there no technology fee nor any movement to levy one."
-
- It would be interesting to compare these "technology" fees (I thought all
- learning was a type of "technology") with parking fees, athletic fees, and
- so on. Are they appropriately balanced?
-
- > This is in reference to make a special tuition assessment for all (note
- > all) students. This not only would cover computer labs but help student
- > E-mail access including access to their instructors, INTERNET, etc.
-
- All students at UNBSJ (where I am) have free access to the internet, I
- think, if they are enrolled in a computer course. I'm not sure about
- other students, but I think they can have free access if they ask for it.
- (We have medicare, too!)
-
- > Since the competent and less motivated students will go to the
- > university, tuition is needed if for no other reason than commitment.
-
- Sounds appropriate to me -- do you think $2,100 is enough?
-
- > It the taxpayers won't pay for the additional information technology
- > infrastructure, etc., then the students must.
-
- I think my original question was whether it was balanced appropriately
- across users, given different requirements for different courses. But I
- am now beginning to think it is all a red herring, and that these costs
- are trivial in relation to -- dare I say it -- professors' salaries!
-
- - Gary Davis
- -------------------------------------------------------------
- Gary Davis (PhD) Associate Professor Faculty of Business
- University of New Brunswick in Saint John (UNBSJ)
- P.O. Box 5050 Saint John, N.B. Canada E2K 3M2
- (506) 648-5537 (Answering machine at my office)
- (506) 648-5528 (UNBSJ fax machine) davis@unbsj.ca
-