home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!UCS.UWPLATT.EDU!SUNDIN_C
- Approved-By: EDTECH Moderator <21765EDT@MSU.BITNET>
- Message-ID: <EDTECH%92121417103028@OHSTVMA.ACS.OHIO-STATE.EDU>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.edtech
- Approved: NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 17:03:19 EST
- Sender: EDTECH - Educational Technology <EDTECH@OHSTVMA.BITNET>
- From: "CHARLES SUNDIN, CHAIR, CHEMISTRY" <SUNDIN_C@ucs.uwplatt.edu>
- Subject: Computer Fees
- Lines: 28
-
- On Fri, 11 Dec 1992, I wrote:
-
- > I maintain it is in society's best interest to have the best and the
- > brightest go into areas in which they are the best and brightest rather
- > than into areas which would have lower tuition, fees, etc.
-
- On Mon, Dec 14 Gary Davis wrote:
-
- >But the best and brightest and MOST MOTIVATED could be given scholarships
- >to pay their way. Some of these subsidies could come from the less good
- >and less bright but more affluent (and still competent) who want to
- >participate in these expensive programmes.
-
- It is in society's best technological and economical interest to have
- the best and the brightest go into areas in which they are brightest.
-
- However, it is also in society's best sociological and
- survival interests to have the competent but less affluent have the
- opportunity to enter the higher paying areas which probably are also
- more expensive to teach.
-
- Subsidies should not come from selected fellow students.
-
- Excuse this duplicate message. The first was garbled in editing when I
- was informed of other messages coming through. Oh, for a new system.
-
- Charles Sundin, University of Wisconsin-Platteville
- SUNDIN_C@ucs.uwplatt.edu
-