home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!csn!copper!cudnvr!atchampion
- From: atchampion@cudnvr.denver.colorado.edu
- Newsgroups: alt.support.big-folks
- Subject: Re: Appreciation of the big & beautiful woman
- Message-ID: <1992Dec14.155654.1@cudnvr.denver.colorado.edu>
- Date: 14 Dec 92 15:49:54 GMT
- References: <1992Dec11.200657.16849@grebyn.com> <1992Dec12.080318.5946@netcom.com> <1992Dec12.153559.5815@grebyn.com> <1992Dec13.025800.11506@netcom.com>
- Sender: netnews@copper.denver.colorado.edu
- Lines: 20
-
- In article <1992Dec13.025800.11506@netcom.com>, artemis@netcom.com (Michelle Dick) writes:
-
- > Yes, I think you did make that point. Sorry. My comments were
- > directed at the part of the DSM (or whatever the initials were) that
- > said the diagnoses was made if the individual was upset with the urges
- > *or* acted upon them. If the individual where happy about the desires
- > and acted upon them, I might use the term fetishist colloquially but I
- > wouldn't consider it a problem or a pathology.
-
- According to the DSM III, we're ALL nuts.
-
- Pass the sundae, please.
-
-
- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-
- Alex Champion
- atchampion@cudnvr.denver.colorado.edu
-
- "Ahh, but it IS the size that counts."
-