home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!jvnc.net!yale.edu!spool.mu.edu!agate!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!fs7.ece.cmu.edu!crabapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu!andrew.cmu.edu!aw2t+
- From: aw2t+@andrew.cmu.edu (Alex R.N. Wetmore)
- Newsgroups: alt.irc
- Subject: Re: A new (very simple) bot solution
- Message-ID: <EfAngYG00XQUMbm_9R@andrew.cmu.edu>
- Date: 19 Dec 92 15:09:24 GMT
- Organization: Sophomore, Math/Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
- Lines: 11
- In-Reply-To: <1gqne3INN9mb@mirror.digex.com>
-
- Excerpts from netnews.alt.irc: 17-Dec-92 Re: A new (very simple) bot..
- by Matt Mosley@digex.com
- > Actually, this really should be done. A "+b *!*@*" should replace all
- > other bans, and remove them. Same thing with "+b *!*@my.host.edu" removing
- > "+b *!*@*.host.edu" ... it's called redundancy, folks.
-
- Yeah, but once you remove the "*!*@*" ban you loose the older bans too.
- There might be a reason that I channel wants to always ban one person,
- but someone (most likely as a joke) wants to ban "*!*@*".
-
- alex (htoaster)
-