home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.irc
- Path: sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!cs.mu.OZ.AU!mrgreen
- From: mrgreen@mullian.ee.mu.OZ.AU (matthew green)
- Subject: Re: yes or no? (bot deopping)
- Message-ID: <mrgreen.724407966@munagin>
- Sender: news@cs.mu.OZ.AU
- Organization: Computer Science, University of Melbourne, Australia
- References: <1g5lmrINNh0k@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> <85220@ut-emx.uucp> <1992Dec13.022557.11079@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <1gjaqjINNi2j@manuel.anu.edu.au>
- Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 08:26:06 GMT
- Lines: 33
-
- titus@coombs.anu.edu.au (titus chiu) writes:
-
- >gl8f@fermi.clas.Virginia.EDU (Greg Lindahl) writes:
- >>I think that all your solution would do is result in an explosion of
- >>number of servers, server operators, and kills.
-
- >why dont we just get rid of modes altogether :*) ... and have negative
- >channels back :*) (without mode command to -s it i guess) .. as for
- >kicks .. that really isnt necessary with the advance ignore command of
- >the ircII clients nowadays.. is it?
-
- Yup, with ignore, KILL and to a less degree, KICK, are becoming redundant.
-
- [ ... ]
-
- >>seconds? Does anyone think IRC would be less useful with a strict rate
- >>limit on nick, topic, and join?
-
- >well... i doubt nick and topic msgs need to be issued in quick successions
- >in any normal use.. as for join.. well.. the only problem i c if join
- >command is subjected to flood control is for people who join a few channels
- >in their .ircrc and it will slow them down a little..
-
- Whats wrong with
-
- join #one,#two,#three,#four,#five,#six
-
- ?? If you make the server only take that as one message from the client
- (unlike privmsg), then you don't turn on flood control.
-
- phone..
-
- say NO to non-local operator KILLS..
-