home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!news.funet.fi!tik.vtt.fi!hemuli.tik.vtt.fi!Markku.Savela
- From: Markku.Savela@tel.vtt.fi (Markku Savela)
- Newsgroups: alt.irc
- Subject: Re: yes or no? (bot deopping)
- Date: 14 Dec 1992 07:41:41 GMT
- Organization: Technical Research Centre of Finland
- Lines: 16
- Message-ID: <1ghdrlINNsu6@tik.vtt.fi>
- References: <1fgmksINNjhu@manuel.anu.edu.au> <19NOV199219244875@rigel.tamu.edu>
- <1g5lmrINNh0k@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> <85220@ut-emx.uucp>
- <1992Dec14.022512.20210@fwi.uva.nl>
- Reply-To: savela@tel.vtt.fi (Markku Savela)
- NNTP-Posting-Host: tel4.tel.vtt.fi
- In-reply-to: bolwidt@fwi.uva.nl's message of Mon, 14 Dec 1992 02:25:12 GMT
-
- In article <1992Dec14.022512.20210@fwi.uva.nl> bolwidt@fwi.uva.nl (Erwin Bolwidt) writes:
-
- >And of course there need only be a 'per channel' central server, that is
- >assigned as the channel is created. And if it goes down, it can be taken over
- >by another server, say the server who's name,xored with the name of the ori-
- >ginal server and then made into a hashvalue, is the lowest.
-
- Be sure to include all logistics for the case where the same channel
- is created in two or more isolated nets with associated "central
- servers" and these splinters split and combine in various
- combinations. Or, the case where net gets splits and the other half
- gets a new controlling server, then later rejoined..
-
- --
- Markku Savela (savela@tel.vtt.fi), Technical Research Centre of Finland
- Telecommunications Laboratory, Otakaari 7 B, SF-02150 ESPOO, Finland
-