home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!agate!netsys!pagesat!a2i!sgiblab!sdd.hp.com!hamblin.math.byu.edu!arizona.edu!telcom.arizona.edu!leonard
- Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.tcp-ip.multinet
- Subject: Re: Finger
- Message-ID: <1992Nov16.114903.3987@arizona.edu>
- From: leonard@telcom.arizona.edu (Aaron Leonard)
- Date: 16 Nov 92 11:49:01 MST
- Reply-To: Leonard@Arizona.EDU
- References: <1992Nov16.133456.9310@abo.fi>
- Distribution: world,local
- Organization: University of Arizona Telecommunications
- Nntp-Posting-Host: penny.telcom.arizona.edu
- Lines: 12
-
- In article <1992Nov16.133456.9310@abo.fi>, HEGE@finabo.abo.fi (Kaj H{ggman DC) writes:
-
- | Hello Multinetters!
- |
- | I'd like something "lighter" than Multinet Finger to answer incoming
- | finger-requests over tcp/ip. Does anybody have something simple just
- | showing logged in users, that could replace the Multinet finger ?
- | Or are there any non-documented switches that I could use :-)
-
- This isn't non-documented, but how about the command $ MULTINET RUSERS?
-
- Aaron
-