home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!netsys!ibmpcug!pipex!warwick!uknet!lsl!snail
- From: snail@lsl.co.uk
- Newsgroups: uk.misc
- Subject: Re: 29 Feb 2000?
- Message-ID: <1992Nov18.120934.2650@lsl.co.uk>
- Date: 18 Nov 92 11:09:34 GMT
- References: <6434@sersun1.essex.ac.uk> <sb380.721988321@KingsX>
- Distribution: uk
- Organization: Laser-Scan Ltd., Cambridge
- Lines: 12
-
- In article <sb380.721988321@KingsX>, sb380@city.ac.uk (HOLT A D) writes:
- > peter@serv2.essex.ac.uk (Peter Allott) writes:
- >>As it also thinks 29 Feb 4000 will exist It's clearly wrong
- > Probably won't exist - but only because it is unlikely that another
- > 2000 years will pass without the calender being reorganised.
- Because civilization probably won't last that long. The year'll still be there,
- but we won't, sadly neither will most other creatures.
- --
- snail@lsl.co.uk
-
- You Have To Remember, You Need To Believe,
- The Time Has Past, Dust In The Leaves.
-