home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!darwin.sura.net!sgiblab!sgigate!rutgers!sun-barr!west.West.Sun.COM!cronkite.Central.Sun.COM!texsun!moxie!ernest!mic!montagar!davidc
- From: davidc@montagar.com (David L. Cathey)
- Newsgroups: tx.politics
- Subject: Re: Football Failures at Bowie Force end of Season
- Message-ID: <1992Nov17.234700.16932@montagar.com>
- Date: 18 Nov 92 04:47:00 GMT
- References: <1992Nov14.145920.16925@montagar.com> <1992Nov16.185242.15081@watson.ibm.com>
- Distribution: tx
- Organization: Montagar Software Concepts, Plano TX
- Lines: 25
-
- In article <1992Nov16.185242.15081@watson.ibm.com>, johniac@austin.ibm.com (John Iacoletti/100000) writes:
- > David L. Cathey (davidc@montagar.com) wrote:
- > : Rights of the individual are more important that society. Okay...
- > : . . .
- > : Yep, John is really concerned about the rights of the individual that
- > : was shot... And none at all for the individual survivors still living.
- >
- > David, HE'S DEAD. Dead people don't have any rights. What amazes me is that
- > you are so concerned about where to put the body of a dead burglar. If he
- > left enough money to plant himself in the ground then fine. If his family
- > wants to come pick his body up, then fine.
-
- So if I walk up and shoot you, it's okay? You would no longer have
- any rights (you're DEAD), so it wouldn't make any difference would it?
-
- Did I shoot you in self defense? Premeditated homicide? Was deadly
- force required? Both ways you are dead, but there is a definite legal
- interpretation in violation of rights. Which you appearently don't see...
-
- > John Iacoletti IBM AWS Austin Internet: johniac@austin.ibm.com
- > My opinions do not reflect the views of the IBM Corporation
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- David L. Cathey |INET: davidc@montagar.com
- Montagar Software Concepts |UUCP: ...!montagar!davidc
- P. O. Box 260772, Plano TX 75026-0772 |Fone: (214)-618-2117
-