home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky talk.politics.misc:60536 alt.politics.elections:24004 alt.rush-limbaugh:9863 talk.rumors:1323 alt.activism:18914
- Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.elections,alt.rush-limbaugh,talk.rumors,alt.activism
- Path: sparky!uunet!walter!porthos!troy!bobh
- From: bobh@troy.cc.bellcore.com (hettmansperger,robert)
- Subject: Re: Bork is a good judge? (NOT!) (was Re: Anita Hill to Head EEOC
- Organization: Bellcore, Livingston, NJ
- Date: Tue, 17 Nov 92 14:07:33 GMT
- Message-ID: <1992Nov17.140733.29126@porthos.cc.bellcore.com>
- References: <1992Nov13.201048.23212@novell.com> <BxupxB.By2@eis.calstate.edu>
- Sender: netnews@porthos.cc.bellcore.com (USENET System Software)
- Lines: 20
-
- In article <BxupxB.By2@eis.calstate.edu> kmitche@eis.calstate.edu (Kenneth Mitchell) writes:
- >bboerner@novell.com (Brendan B. Boerner) writes:
- >>
- >Actually, Brendan, you couldn'tbe more wrong if you tried. Judge Bork
- >would most likely have ruled that the Federal government had NO powers
- >other than those specifically listed in the Constitution; that's what
- >scared the liberals so badly, because 95% of the liberal agenda would be
- >thrown out on that basis.
-
- No, I don't think that was the real reason. If it were, the conservatives
- wouldn't have picked him eather (the Libertarians might have), since about
- 95% (okay, maybe only 94%) of the conservative agenda was not part of the
- original intent of the Federal Government (Big Defense, Government
- intervention in the economy via tax manipulations, "social engineering"
- through enforced morality, etc.).
-
- The real reason that the right liked him and the left didn't goes back
- to his Nixon-friendly activities after Watergate.
-
- -Bob
-