home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.politics.animals
- Path: sparky!uunet!uunet.ca!geac!zooid!rwaigh
- From: Rosemary Waigh <rwaigh@zooid.guild.org>
- Subject: Re: Robodoc and animal testing
- Reply-To: rwaigh@zooid.UUCP (Rosemary Waigh)
- Organization: The Zoo of Ids
- Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 15:33:00 GMT
- Message-ID: <1992Nov23.153300.897@zooid.guild.org>
- References: <BxxzwE.BFF.2@cs.cmu.edu> <1992Nov20.152434.14988@zooid.guild.org> <1992Nov22.030052.22285@refrig.dixie.com>
- Lines: 14
-
- In article <1992Nov22.030052.22285@refrig.dixie.com> todd@refrig.dixie.com (Todd H.) writes:
- >
- >I think it's safe to assume that dogs and humans both have bones.
- >Don't you?
- >
- Yes, but dog skeletons are a different size and shape than human
- skeletons, which may or may not affect the experiment.
-
- Besides I meant my comment to apply to non-human animal research
- in general, not just this particular experiment.
-
- Ro
-
-
-