home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #27 / NN_1992_27.iso / spool / soc / women / 20154 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-11-22  |  1.2 KB
  1. Xref: sparky soc.women:20154 alt.abortion.inequity:5264 talk.abortion:49161 alt.feminism:4873 soc.men:19790
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!emory!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!nntp-server.caltech.edu!peri
  3. From: peri@cco.caltech.edu (Michal Leah Peri)
  4. Newsgroups: soc.women,alt.abortion.inequity,talk.abortion,alt.feminism,soc.men
  5. Subject: Re: DNA testing
  6. Date: 22 Nov 1992 19:54:31 GMT
  7. Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
  8. Lines: 15
  9. Message-ID: <1eoohnINN52k@gap.caltech.edu>
  10. References: <1992Nov21.024836.18702@zooid.guild.org> <1992Nov21.144417.23320@netcom.com> <1em0tpINNs2a@gap.caltech.edu> <1992Nov22.022410.2818@panix.com>
  11. NNTP-Posting-Host: sandman.caltech.edu
  12.  
  13. gcf@panix.com (Gordon Fitch) writes:
  14.  
  15. >I seems to me it would have to be invasive, unless we find
  16. >out how to go through alternate dimensions.  There are some
  17. >other questions here: Is this a proposal for compulsory testing?  
  18. >Suppose no one wanted to know who the father was?  Or suppose 
  19. >the father(s) didn't particularly want to know; would it still 
  20. >be required? Obtaining DNA from some of the possible fathers
  21. >might be a problem.
  22. >-- 
  23.  
  24. Especially when the mother claims that Santa Clause is the father.
  25. Ha Ha.  Or is it Ho Ho Ho?
  26.  
  27.                             --  Michal
  28.