home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #27 / NN_1992_27.iso / spool / soc / singles / 31159 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1992-11-18  |  1.4 KB  |  36 lines
  1. Newsgroups: soc.singles
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!s5!sethb
  3. From: sethb@fid.morgan.com (Seth Breidbart)
  4. Subject: Re: What is attractive to women?
  5. Message-ID: <1992Nov18.231208.17138@fid.morgan.com>
  6. Organization: my opinions only
  7. References: <1e9c48INNc5d@FUNCTOR.SYSTEMSZ.CS.YALE.EDU> <5745@jptcs.COM> <1992Nov18.051430.11930@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
  8. Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 23:12:08 GMT
  9. Lines: 25
  10.  
  11. In article <1992Nov18.051430.11930@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
  12. cjp8b@dayhoff.med.Virginia.EDU (Chris Penington) writes:
  13. >In article <5745@jptcs.COM> tps@jptcs.com writes:
  14. >>Sandra Loosemore (loosemore-sandra@cs.yale.edu) wrote:
  15. >>: a dress, and I wouldn't be caught dead in high heels either.
  16. >>               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  17. >>Now THAT'S a shame! :(
  18. >
  19. >Huh? High heels are the female equivalent of ties on men: pointless,
  20.                                                            ^^^^^^^^^
  21. High heels are more likely to have points than almost any other
  22. article of clothing.
  23.  
  24. >uncomfortable adornment,
  25.  
  26. Do you consider all adornment pointless?
  27.  
  28. >There's been a lot of talk about non-conformists. Me, I wear what I
  29. >feel comfortable wearing in the particular situation:
  30.  
  31. Most conformists would say exactly that.  They just happen to feel
  32. comfortable wearing something similar to what other people are
  33. wearing, so that they don't stand out because of their clothing.
  34.  
  35. Seth        sethb@fid.morgan.com
  36.