home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: soc.singles
- Path: sparky!uunet!hela.iti.org!usc!srhqla!dks
- From: dks@sr.com (Dave K. Sprow)
- Subject: Re: What is attractive to women?
- Message-ID: <1992Nov18.174338.3089@sr.com>
- Reply-To: dks@srhqla.UUCP (Dave K. Sprow)
- Organization: Silent Radio, Los Angeles
- References: <1dpi4fINNrg7@FUNCTOR.SYSTEMSZ.CS.YALE.EDU> <5702@jptcs.COM> <JMD.92Nov13135433@lion.bear.com> <74344@apple.apple.COM> <htjq-2_@lynx.unm.edu> <1e9c48INNc5d@FUNCTOR.SYSTEMSZ.CS.YALE.EDU> <JMD.92Nov17112736@lion.bear.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 17:43:38 GMT
- Lines: 42
-
- In article <JMD.92Nov17112736@lion.bear.com> jmd@bear.com (Josh Diamond) writes:
- >
- >In article <1e9c48INNc5d@FUNCTOR.SYSTEMSZ.CS.YALE.EDU> loosemore-sandra@cs.yale.edu (Sandra Loosemore) writes:
- >
- > Me, I wouldn't work in a place where I was expected to get dressed up
- > unless I was *really* desperate, which I'm not. Heck, I don't even own
- > a dress, and I wouldn't be caught dead in high heels either.
- >
- >Yeah, I said that too, before they offered me more than twice the
- >salary offered me by anyplace else...
- >
-
- For wearing high heels??
-
-
- >If I had taken the runner up (which didn't require wearing a suit/tie)
- >I would now be making less that a quarter of my present income.
- >In fact, I would be lucky to be working at all, since that was at
- >a military contractor which just had several thousand layoffs...
- >
- >I think that's a reasonable trade-off...
- >
- >
- >Spidey!!!
- >
- >
- >
- >
- >
- >
- >
- >
- >
- >--
- > /\ \ / /\ Josh Diamond jmd@bear.com
- >//\\ .. //\\ AKA Spidey!!! ...!ctr.columbia.edu!ursa!jmd
- >//\(( ))/\\
- >/ < `' > \ Do whatever it takes.
-
- David S.
-
-
-