home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: soc.singles
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!cbnewsi!cbnewsh!att-out!cbfsb!cbnewsg.cb.att.com!jjd1
- From: jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton)
- Subject: Re: net.hugs?
- Message-ID: <1992Nov18.135537.10337@cbfsb.cb.att.com>
- Sender: news@cbfsb.cb.att.com
- Organization: AT&T
- References: <31517@hydra.Helsinki.FI> <1992Nov17.192506.24522@netcom.com> <8cx16zg@rpi.edu>
- Distribution: na
- Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 13:55:37 GMT
- Lines: 23
-
- In article <8cx16zg@rpi.edu> petitc@rpi.edu writes:
- >In article <1992Nov17.192506.24522@netcom.com>, aahz@netcom.com (Mean Green Dancing Machine) writes:
- >|> In article <31517@hydra.Helsinki.FI> taina@cs.Helsinki.FI (Juha Taina) writes:
- >|> >
- >|> >I'd like to ask why people share *hugs* and *kisses* on the net. What
- >|> >is the value of them? Would you also hug and kiss a stranger in real
- >|> >life?
- >
- > I think people don't *HUG* each other nearly enough. We all NEED to be
- >touched. That's what's wrong with the U.S. We're too selfish to touch other
- >people and acknowledge that we DO need other people's attention and affection.
- >So, we use the only 'acceptable' way to need someone---when you're in love.
- >
- >--
- > *HUGS*, a @>---'--,----, and a :&) to whoever needs them.
-
- I feel a need to go back to the Doc's and get a BIG refill of Prozac.
- Coming to a theater near you.
-
- ================================================================================
- Ipsissimus of the Inner Order of Sesquipedalian Fruitcakes
- Sesquipedalian's 'R' Us. ZX-10. DoD#564. There ain't no more.
- ================================================================================
-