home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!ames!olivea!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!aahz
- From: aahz@netcom.com (Mean Green Dancing Machine)
- Newsgroups: soc.singles
- Subject: Re: Seriousness.
- Message-ID: <1992Nov16.130602.2750@netcom.com>
- Date: 16 Nov 92 13:06:02 GMT
- References: <1992Nov16.020712.25404@sol.UVic.CA>
- Organization: Don't blame me, I voted for Bill 'n' Opus
- Lines: 19
-
- In article <1992Nov16.020712.25404@sol.UVic.CA> atovorni@engr.UVic.CA writes:
- >
- >My definition of seriousness in a relationship is that things
- >are getting serious when both partners agree to move in together.
- >
- >What is your definition?
-
- It's a good indicator, but by no means fool-proof. Some people move in
- together rather casually these days, and others maintain separate
- residences for years. How 'bout calling it "serious" when the people
- involved decide to?
- --
- --- Aahz (the *other* Dan Bernstein)
- @netcom.com
-
- Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6
-
- Trying to be happy is like trying to build a machine for which the only
- specification is that it should run noiselessly.
-