home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky soc.singles:30735 alt.romance:14043
- Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.romance
- Path: sparky!uunet!pmafire!mica.inel.gov!ux1!news.byu.edu!eff!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!spool.mu.edu!news.cs.indiana.edu!lynx!carina.unm.edu!blowfish
- From: blowfish@carina.unm.edu (rON.)
- Subject: Re: Being Alone?
- Message-ID: <8hhq10h@lynx.unm.edu>
- Date: Sun, 15 Nov 92 15:07:37 GMT
- Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque
- References: <13NOV92.21925419.0026@lafibm.lafayette.edu> <1992Nov14.105811.1400@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu> <1992Nov15.142817.13083@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>
- Lines: 13
-
- In article <1992Nov15.142817.13083@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode) writes:
- >>Why, if that's when she's ready. Maybe at that point she'll be older
- >>and wiser and truely ready for a complete relationship - one that has
- >>more to do with friendship, acceptance, and reality than the fiction
- >>called romance which is not how things are but how we want them to be.
- >Gosh, that sounds even more cynical than I am--is this allowed on
- >soc.singles? Personally, I wouldn't call romance a fiction at all--
-
- Real romance isn't fiction, I think allison was talking about the generic
- 'romance' (pablum) that one can find in alt.romance and its playground
- companion alt.romance.giggles, er, chat.
- >that< is fiction.
- r.
-