home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!rutgers!igor.rutgers.edu!athos.rutgers.edu!christian
- From: ptfarre@afterlife.ncsc.mil (Peter Farrell)
- Newsgroups: soc.religion.christian
- Subject: Re: New Age paranoia
- Message-ID: <Nov.18.04.45.34.1992.3200@athos.rutgers.edu>
- Date: 18 Nov 92 09:45:36 GMT
- Sender: hedrick@athos.rutgers.edu
- Organization: The Great Beyond
- Lines: 37
- Approved: christian@aramis.rutgers.edu
-
- In article <Nov.17.03.37.33.1992.26564@geneva.rutgers.edu> massengale_m@cubldr.colorado.edu writes:
- >With due respect for Mr. Farell's patriotism, I would suggest that this
- >country is founded on Greco-Roman systems of government, as well as our
- >Judeo-Christian heritage. Intolerance such as he proposes has already
- >brought many people to shores to become Americans. Our country would be
- >less great without them. Should we invite them to leave now?
-
- I have not said that at all. What I DID say is that there is good reason
- for concern at the rise of many very bizarre neo-pagan and occultic practices
- whose practitioners are trying to find validity for their indefensible and
- despicable practices (such as human sacrifice, kidnapping, mutilation,
- theft, vandalism, extortion, terrorism, drug smuggling, murder, etc.) in
- the Constitutional protection of freedom of religion.
-
- I also said that the Constitution was NOT written to protect this
- kind of behavior under ANY guise, religious or otherwise.
-
- Nowhere did I express intolerance for anything but ideas and deeds
- which are manifestly against the very notions that made our country
- possible. This sense of this is so self-evident it should not need
- defense or explanation. That it has (three times, already) is
- more evidence in support of my position that pluralism has run wild,
- both in American popular culture and even in many churches.
- --
- Peter Farrell | "Not everyone who says to me, Lord, Lord,
- ptfarre@afterlife.ncsc.mil | shall enter the kingdom of heaven; but he
- | who does the will of my Father in heaven."
-
- [It was not clear from your original posting that when you referred to
- the Constitution not being used to protect bizarre cults, you had in
- mind only activities such as human sacrifice, theft, etc. As far as I
- know, no one has asserted here that religious freedom should cover any
- of these activities, nor do I think such claims are common. I suspect
- many readers read your posting as opposing use of freedom of religion
- to cover unpopular non-Christian religions of all sorts, i.e. the
- vast majority of "pagan" and "new age" groups, Eastern religions, etc.
- --clh]
-