home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: soc.motss
- Path: sparky!uunet!infonode!norris
- From: norris@infonode.ingr.com (Jeff Norris)
- Subject: Re: bear vs. twink
- Message-ID: <1992Nov19.205409.20229@infonode.ingr.com>
- Organization: Intergraph Corporation, Huntsville, AL.
- References: <14728.2b0b3de6@ohstpy.mps.ohio-state.edu> <46140@ogicse.ogi.edu>
- Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 20:54:09 GMT
- Lines: 31
-
- markm@ogicse.ogi.edu (Mark Morrissey) writes:
- >
- >I find myself pretty much limited to motss, but not further limited and
- >don't particularly appreciate people who assume that just because I am
- >not dating a smooth-skinned person that I could not be so attacted. I
- >am similarly offended by people who assume that I limit my attraction to
- ><insert label here> just because I am dating someone who may fall
- >into that category.
-
- Although there are a few physical traits that I'm not attracted to, I have
- to take the whole package into account (preferably reclining nude beside
- me). And some people I find attractive at first then not later (and visa
- versa). I guess I'm one of those people who, when stating a preference,
- would say "average".
-
- >[...]
- >So let's see more stories about *people* who just might happen to be ursine
- >or smooth or maybe even <gasp> not specified?
-
- When I visited Portland last week, I had to ask Mark how I would know him
- in a crowded restaurant. It occured to me then how I have become acquainted
- with so many of you with very little idea of how you look (the gif archives
- helped a lot later on). Maybe it's better that way: to form an opinion on
- the "attractiveness" of someone before their physical attributes get in the
- way.
-
- Then again, it *is* fun to lust for a body now and then without having to
- *think* about their mind.
-
- -jeff [who has never described his appearance to this group, but wonders
- how others imagine him. (careful, I have a fragile ego)]
-