home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!oracle!unrepliable!bounce
- Newsgroups: soc.motss
- From: dgilly@us.oracle.com (Daniel Gilly)
- Subject: Re: Lesbianville on 20/20
- Message-ID: <1992Nov19.191736.28963@oracle.us.oracle.com>
- Sender: usenet@oracle.us.oracle.com (Oracle News Poster)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: hqpyr1.us.oracle.com
- Organization: Oracle Corporation, Redwood Shores CA 94065
- References: <1992Nov5.114046.27870@netcom.com> <1992Nov5.234027.3306@beaver.cs.washington.edu> <25847@sybase.sybase.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 19:17:36 GMT
- X-Disclaimer: This message was written by an unauthenticated user
- at Oracle Corporation. The opinions expressed are those
- of the user and not necessarily those of Oracle.
- Lines: 23
-
- In article <25847@sybase.sybase.com> black@lester.sybase.com
- (Chris Black) writes:
-
- >|> Inaccurate and exclusionary. Lesbian != muffdiver.
- >|> (That's C for not equal.)
-
- >Both exclusuionary, *and* too inclusive. I have, to my delight, meant
- >plenty of muff-diving men. There are lots of female cocksuckers out
- >there, too.
- >
- >Any theories as to why "muffdiver" and "cocksucker" are assumed to mean
- >motss muffdiver or motss cocksucker?
-
- I won't claim to be a cunning linguist, but I can offer my theory.
-
- "Cocksucker" and "muffdiver" describe what one is, not what one does.
- They reduce someone to that one aspect, so they are usually interpreted
- to be pejorative. So the real question is, why should oral sex with
- motss be something people denigrate?
- --
- ------------------------------------------------------------------
- Daniel Gilly Oracle Corporation
- dgilly@us.oracle.com Redwood Shores, CA
-