home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!spool.mu.edu!agate!ucbvax!mtxinu!sybase!black@sybase.com
- From: black@lester.sybase.com (Chris Black)
- Newsgroups: soc.motss
- Subject: Re: Re: Lesbianville on 20/20
- Keywords: soc.lesbian, soc.muffdiver, soc.dykes, soc.pimply.teenaged.boys
- Message-ID: <25847@sybase.sybase.com>
- Date: 16 Nov 92 19:06:11 GMT
- References: <TDyoTB4w165w@ailanth.UUCP> <1992Nov4.080136.11847@spdcc.com> <1992Nov5.114046.27870@netcom.com> <1992Nov5.234027.3306@beaver.cs.washington.edu>
- Sender: news@Sybase.COM
- Lines: 16
-
- In article <1992Nov5.234027.3306@beaver.cs.washington.edu>, wendyt@cs.washington.edu (Wendy Thrash) writes:
- |> In article <1992Nov5.114046.27870@netcom.com> cjlee@netcom.com (Caroline Jean Lee) writes:
- |> >If there IS a group formed for lg women, may I suggest the name
- |> >soc.muffdiver?
- |>
- |> Inaccurate and exclusionary. Lesbian != muffdiver. (That's C for not equal.)
-
- Both exclusuionary, *and* too inclusive. I have, to my delight, meant
- plenty of muff-diving men. There are lots of female cocksuckers out
- there, too.
-
- Any theories as to why "muffdiver" and "cocksucker" are assumed to mean
- motss muffdiver or motss cocksucker?
-
- -- Chris
- black@sybase.com
-