home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!gumby!wupost!usc!usc!not-for-mail
- From: adolphso@mizar.usc.edu (adolphson)
- Newsgroups: soc.motss
- Subject: Re: Fundamentalists and the clitoris
- Date: 17 Nov 1992 15:30:20 -0800
- Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
- Lines: 17
- Message-ID: <1ebvacINNna7@mizar.usc.edu>
- References: <1992Nov16.212806.4163@netcom.com> <1992Nov17.002547.2196@reed.edu> <1992Nov17.221334.19904@netcom.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: mizar.usc.edu
-
- In article <1992Nov17.221334.19904@netcom.com>
- solovay@netcom.com (Andrew M. Solovay) writes:
-
- > I say this because in almost every mammal species, male nipples
- > and clitorises are *entirely* nonfunctional,
-
- My clitoris is *entirely* nonfunctional? YIKES!
-
- > since they are not
- > stimulated by sexual contact.
-
- Hey, bud, *MY* nipples are stimulated by sexual contact.
- Hell, my nipples are stimulated by the mere thought of
- sexual contact.
-
- Arne
-
-