home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky soc.motss:47655 alt.politics.homosexuality:7235 co.politics:2036
- Path: sparky!uunet!ogicse!das-news.harvard.edu!spdcc!rdonahue
- From: rdonahue@spdcc.com (Bob Donahue)
- Newsgroups: soc.motss,alt.politics.homosexuality,co.politics
- Subject: Re: Colorado Amendment 2: The First Fatality
- Message-ID: <1992Nov15.175739.1451@spdcc.com>
- Date: 15 Nov 92 17:57:39 GMT
- Article-I.D.: spdcc.1992Nov15.175739.1451
- References: <1992Nov13.205736.9819@wam.umd.edu> <RHAYDEN.92Nov14170015@hqsun2.oracle.com> <1992Nov15.054551.5904@ucsu.Colorado.EDU>
- Organization: insert anything here
- Lines: 25
-
- mudge@ucsu.Colorado.EDU (MUDGE BRIAN WAYNE) writes:
- >>aap@wam.umd.edu (Alberto Adolfo Pinkas) writes:
-
- [a really lame excuse - but what's new?]
-
- >> So, the solution is: Keep the Gay until you both are out of bussiness?
-
- > How do they know your employee is gay? I think, as an employer, that you
- >should have the right to implement a reasonable dress code on your
- >employees. So, if the problem is a SILENCE=DEATH T', or other possibly
- >offensive, definitely political accessories, merely implement a policy
- >which prevents people from voicing political views while on the job in
- >your store. Most stores have such policies anyway, to prevent their
- >employees from driving off customers who are easily offended.
-
- Oh, puhleese.
-
- Let's assume that the guy is just "out".
-
- By your assertion then, only closeted GBLO*-folks should
- be protected.
-
- Way to be, Wayne.
-
- BBC
-