home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #27 / NN_1992_27.iso / spool / soc / men / 19349 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-11-15  |  1.1 KB
  1. Xref: sparky soc.men:19349 soc.women:19647 alt.abortion.inequity:5122 talk.abortion:48048 alt.feminism:4501
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!ames!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!nntp-server.caltech.edu!peri
  3. From: peri@cco.caltech.edu (Michal Leah Peri)
  4. Newsgroups: soc.men,soc.women,alt.abortion.inequity,talk.abortion,alt.feminism
  5. Subject: Re: Back Again To Father
  6. Date: 15 Nov 1992 21:06:37 GMT
  7. Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
  8. Lines: 14
  9. Message-ID: <1e6e4tINNk1r@gap.caltech.edu>
  10. References: <1992Nov15.045712.22412@zooid.guild.org>
  11. NNTP-Posting-Host: sandman.caltech.edu
  12.  
  13. Will Steeves <goid@zooid.guild.org> writes:
  14.  
  15. >peri@cco.caltech.edu (Michal Leah Peri) writes...
  16. >MLP>But we're not talking about notifying the husband in case of the wife's
  17. >MLP>*pregnancy* or *birth*.  We're talking about notifying him in the case
  18. >MLP>of her getting an *abortion*, when presumeably there would be no child.
  19.  
  20. >Indeed, if a man *is* going to be forced to be a father, I *strongly* believe
  21. >that he at least has the right to know if he is REALLY the father.
  22.  
  23. But what if he's *not* going to become a father (ie, if she's going to 
  24. abort)?
  25.  
  26.                         --  Michal
  27.