home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: soc.history
- Path: sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!att!dptg!ulysses!allegra!princeton!phoenix.Princeton.EDU!glhewitt
- From: glhewitt@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Gary Livingston Hewitt)
- Subject: Re: Founding Fathers
- Message-ID: <1992Nov18.212008.21608@Princeton.EDU>
- Originator: news@nimaster
- Sender: news@Princeton.EDU (USENET News System)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: phoenix.princeton.edu
- Organization: Princeton University
- References: <1eckbfINNgr3@fido.asd.sgi.com> <1edhpiINNd47@transfer.stratus.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 21:20:08 GMT
- Lines: 40
-
- In article <1edhpiINNd47@transfer.stratus.com> jmann@vineland.pubs.stratus.com writes:
- [regarding whether non/anti-slavery should have been a condition of
- entry into the US way back in 177-whenever]
-
- >The US, at the time of the Constitution, was very worried about
- >the collapse of the country, and subsequent takeover by
- >European powers. Furthermore, the compromise was needed to get
- >several of the most important states into the fold. Virginia
- >and the Carolinas were important to the new country. If, for
- >example, only Georgia was holding out, the union may have gone
- >on without them. We couldn't have gone on without Virginia. It
- >would have been a lot like France or Germany holding out from
- >the EC. The EC would have much more trouble surviving without
- >one of those countries than they will in surviving without
- >Spain.
-
- If you think about it, the US *did* lose a few colonies -- East & West
- Florida, Nova Scotia, Canada, Quebec, not to mention the Caribbean. In
- addition, slavery was legal in all of the 13 colonies in 1774 when the
- "United States" came into existence with the meeting of the Continental
- Congress and when these decisions would have had to have been made
- (don't you just love that syntax -- 5 helping verbs!).
-
- When slavery does become a condition of admission into the Union, it is
- a crisis every time (first time in 1820 w/ Missouri, 1854 w/ Kansas &
- Nebraska); and eventually it led to Civil War. I don't think that
- anyone in 1774 thought that it would lead to Civil War, but certainly
- even by 1787 and the Constitutional Convention the delegates knew well
- what they would be tampering with.
-
- How to explain the Northwest Ordinance (which banned slavery in the
- process of organizing the Northwest Territories) in this context, I
- don't know.
-
- Gary
- --
- ++====+========+==========+=======+===++
- || | Gary| L. Hewitt| | || HELP! I've been imprisoned
- || glh|ewitt@ph|oenix.prin|ceton.e|du || by my .signature! HELP!
- ++====+========+==========+=======+===++
-