home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky soc.history:9514 misc.legal:20112 sci.econ:8741
- Path: sparky!uunet!portal!cup.portal.com!edwardk
- From: edwardk@cup.portal.com (edward chungfan kwok)
- Newsgroups: soc.history,misc.legal,sci.econ
- Subject: Re: Sherman Act
- Message-ID: <69762@cup.portal.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Nov 92 08:25:49 PST
- Organization: The Portal System (TM)
- References: <1992Nov16.013012.21277@gordian.com>
- <1992Nov16.235843.2228@midway.uchicago.edu> <13221@optilink.UUCP>
- <1992Nov18.042647.17597@midway.uchicago.edu>
- Lines: 9
-
- >>
- >>How could it? Into the 1920s, corporations weren't subject to the
- >>Sherman Act -- only unions were.
- >
- >I suspect American Tobacco Corp. would be surprised by this characterization.
- >
- And of course, they tricked the Rockefellers into splitting up Standard Oil
- thinking that the Sherman Act may actually apply to them, Clayton Cramer
- notwithstanding..
-