home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky soc.history:9497 misc.legal:20096 sci.econ:8726
- Newsgroups: soc.history,misc.legal,sci.econ
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!ames!ncar!uchinews!ellis!thf2
- From: thf2@ellis.uchicago.edu (Ted Frank)
- Subject: Sherman Act
- Message-ID: <1992Nov18.042647.17597@midway.uchicago.edu>
- Followup-To: misc.legal,sci.econ
- Sender: news@uchinews.uchicago.edu (News System)
- Reply-To: thf2@midway.uchicago.edu
- Organization: University of Chicago Computing Organizations
- References: <1992Nov16.013012.21277@gordian.com> <1992Nov16.235843.2228@midway.uchicago.edu> <13221@optilink.UUCP>
- Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 04:26:47 GMT
- Lines: 15
-
- In article <13221@optilink.UUCP> cramer@optilink.UUCP (Clayton Cramer) writes:
- >In article <1992Nov16.235843.2228@midway.uchicago.edu>, thf2@ellis.uchicago.edu (Ted Frank) writes:
- >> We'll even leave aside the argument that the Sherman Act had a positive
- >> effect on the economy in its first forty years.
- >
- >How could it? Into the 1920s, corporations weren't subject to the
- >Sherman Act -- only unions were.
-
- I suspect American Tobacco Corp. would be surprised by this characterization.
-
- Ted "tie-ins backwards-R us" Frank
- --
- ted frank | thf2@ellis.uchicago.edu
- standard disclaimers | void where prohibited
- the university of chicago law school, chicago, illinois 60637
-