home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!news.media.mit.edu!letu1419%mstr.hgc.edu
- From: letu1419@mstr.hgc.edu (tuan le)
- Newsgroups: soc.culture.vietnamese
- Subject: Re: [POL] That was then, this is now
- Message-ID: <1992Nov24.021702.18950@news.media.mit.edu>
- Date: 24 Nov 92 02:17:02 GMT
- Sender: owner-scv@media.mit.edu
- Reply-To: letu1419@mstr.hgc.edu
- Organization: SCV Relay
- Lines: 32
- Originator: daemon@media-lab.media.mit.edu
-
-
- In article <By3wsz.K2z@cs.uiuc.edu> drk@melodian.cs.uiuc.edu (Dave Kohr) writes:
- >In article <22592@drutx.ATT.COM> kvt@druwa.ATT.COM (TranKV) writes:
- >>Winter 1972 - THE SOUTH VIETNAM GOVERNMENT was accused of "dictactorship"
- >>and being THE ONLY ROAD-BLOCK TO A BETTER VIETNAM.
- >>
- >>Winter 1992 - US INDIFFERENCE AND TRADE EMBARGO are accused as THE ONLY
- >>ROAD-BLOCK TO A BETTER VIETNAM.
- >>
- >>Situations are the same but people use opposite reasoning.
- >>ARE WE TAKEN FOR A RIDE?
- >>
- >>Kim
- >
- >Who precisely are these people using inconsistent reasoning?
-
-
- Oh no, the reasoning of "this is now" people is remarkably consistent and
- very much in line with the "that was then" people. The only inconsistency I
- may see is the missing of the reasoning of Winter 82. The "that was then"
- people have winter 72 reasoning, "this is now" have winter 92, can anybody
- show me the winter 82 reasoning of the "then and now" people, or why we didn't
- the winter 82 reasoning?
-
- TNL
-
- PS: I repost this to compare direct posting and posting thru media.mit.edu
-
- >--
- >Dave Kohr CS Graduate Student Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
- >Work: 3244 DCL, (217)333-6561 Home: (217)359-9350 E-mail: drk@cs.uiuc.edu
- > "One either has none or not enough."
-