home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!sgiblab!darwin.sura.net!dtix!relay!diamond.nswc.navy.mil!rsherme
- From: rsherme@diamond.nswc.navy.mil (Russel Shermer (R43))
- Newsgroups: sci.research
- Subject: fyi #148: NASA Space Science & Applications Advisory Committee Meets
- Keywords: science, research, funding, nasa, legislation, congress.
- Message-ID: <1992Nov17.223008.25174@relay.nswc.navy.mil>
- Date: 17 Nov 92 22:30:08 GMT
- Sender: news@relay.nswc.navy.mil
- Reply-To: rsherme@chaos.nswc.navy.mil
- Organization: NAVSWC DD White Oak Det. R43
- Lines: 107
-
- Posted for:
- Public Information Division
- American Institute of Physics
- Contact: Audrey T. Leath
- Phone: (202) 332-9662
- Email: fyi@aip.org
-
-
- NASA Space Science & Applications Advisory Committee Meets
-
- FYI No. 148, November 16, 1992
-
- On November 4-6, in NASA's new headquarters building, the Space
- Science and Applications Advisory Committee (SSAAC) met for what
- might be the last time in its present form. Its future is in
- question because of recent organizational changes made at NASA
- which bifurcate the Office of Space Science and Applications
- (OSSA.) Committee members worried that with the reorganization,
- the ability to build consensus and integrate across all scientific
- disciplines within NASA might be lost.
-
- OSSA Associate Administrator Lennard Fisk, who will become NASA's
- Chief Scientist when the reorganization takes effect, began the
- meeting with a review of the space science accomplishments in
- fiscal year 1992 and the prospects for 1993 and beyond. He
- announced that 1992 was "a hell of a good year for space science."
- Adjustments to the AXAF, Cassini, and EOS programs in the past
- year, he said, made him "feel a lot more comfortable relative to
- growth in 1994." Of the fiscal 1993 budget, Fisk said there was
- bad news and good news: "The bad news is that we lost money [from
- the request;] the good news is that we lost less money than the
- other guys." Space Science received about half of its requested
- $250 million increase over 1992.
-
- Asked where Microgravity and Life Sciences would fall in the
- reorganized NASA, Fisk would only say, "either it stays within
- Space Science as a whole,... or it doesn't." On the
- reorganization, he said, "the actual, physical transition will
- occur when all the pieces are in place."
-
- The committee then discussed some major issues of concern,
- including OSSA's Research and Analysis (R&A) account, which
- supports research grants at universities and NASA centers, and its
- Mission Operations and Data Analysis (MO&DA) accounts, both of
- which have been hard hit by budget cuts. SSAAC is preparing a
- study on the problems caused by flat R&A budgets, and members of
- various discipline subcommittees gave reports of the ramifications
- within their fields.
-
- Planetary scientist Jonathan Lunine of the University of Arizona
- listed some common problems: A growing percentage of researchers
- are funded with "soft" money (paid out of grant money rather than
- by their university) which, he said, "exacerbates the cost of
- research." Research costs are also rising due to the increased
- costs of instruments and facilities. The average grant size (in
- planetary science, most grants range from $30,000 to $60,000)
- results in principle investigators applying for numerous grants.
- Because so many grants are renewed, few new PIs receive funding,
- and the community loses talented researchers.
-
- Timothy Killeen of the University of Michigan Space Physics
- Research Laboratory reported that his subcommittee had concluded
- that "in the long term, a mechanism must be found to correct the
- misperception in Congress and OMB [the Office of Management and
- Budget] that R&A represents a budget category that can be safely
- cut without jeopardizing the flight program."
-
- James Houck, an astronomy professor from Cornell, questioned
- whether the research community was growing too rapidly, and noted
- that tight budgets were causing PIs to replace postdoctoral help
- with graduate students, in what he called "a gambit to save money
- by hiring cheap labor."
-
- On the second day, the committee met with NASA Administrator Daniel
- Goldin, who explained his rationale for the reorganization and his
- view of NASA's purpose. (See FYI #147 for quotes from Goldin.)
-
- One of SSAAC's deepest concerns is the loss of an overall Associate
- Administrator for space science and, in particular, the loss of
- Fisk from that position. Committee members sought assurances from
- Goldin that Fisk's new position as NASA Chief Scientist would be
- more than a figurehead. One member stated to Goldin, "Len [Fisk]
- is held in extremely high regard by the scientific community, and
- they're not going to take an enthusiastic view of a reduction in
- his influence" to a role of "global ambassador." Goldin promised
- that "Len is fully empowered;... I'm looking to Len to set forth a
- process for quality control and integration."
-
- The committee members departed on November 6 with no resolution on
- their future role or structure, but with vague assurances by Goldin
- that the functions of integration and strategic planning over all
- space science disciplines would be preserved in some form. As a
- committee member commented, "You could take any number of spins off
- of what you heard [Goldin say.]"
-
- It is now the responsibility of the committee chairman, MIT's
- Center for Space Research director Claude Canizares, to produce a
- report on the meeting to be sent to NASA's Advisory Council, which
- meets this week.
-
-
- ###############
- Public Information Division
- American Institute of Physics
- Contact: Audrey T. Leath
- (202) 332-9662
- ##END##########
-