home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!ornl!sunova!convex!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!bu.edu!dartvax!coos.dartmouth.edu!ejlund
- From: ejlund@coos.dartmouth.edu (Eric J. Lund)
- Newsgroups: sci.physics
- Subject: Re: Inelastic versus Elastic
- Message-ID: <1992Nov22.174559.22193@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>
- Date: 22 Nov 92 17:45:59 GMT
- References: <1992Nov22.101430.455@news.wesleyan.edu>
- Sender: news@dartvax.dartmouth.edu (The News Manager)
- Organization: Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH
- Lines: 31
-
- BBLAIS@eagle.wesleyan.edu (BRIAN S. BLAIS) writes:
-
- >A friend of mine wrote me:
- >--
- >Suppose that you have a bullet running into a block. It does so in a perfectly
- >inelastic manner. That is, the bullet stays in the block after the collision
- >imparting its momentum into the combination of itself and the block. However,
- >some of the energy of the motion is lost in the form of heat, so kinetic
- >energy is not conserved.
-
- >Why? I am looking for an intuitive explanation of the conservation of moment
- >that allows one to see clearly and distinctly that, even though some of the
- >quantity of motion is converted into heat, the quantity of motion as expressed
- >by _mv_ remains the same.
- >--
-
- > I was trying to think of some reply to this, and thought that people
- >one the Net might like thinking about it. I would like to know if anyone has
- >any good way of looking at this problem.
-
- > Brian Blais
-
- The atoms of the bullet and the block have random motions. The greater the
- random motion, the "hotter" the substance. When the bullet hits the block,
- the atoms of both are kicked violently, hence more random motion. There's
- also some potential energy in the stretching of interatomic bonds. Some of
- the kinetic energy of the bullet also goes into moving air molecules, so
- you hear a sound when the bullet hits. I may be overlooking something, but
- that's the general idea.
-
- Eric Lund
-