NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #27/NN_1992_27.iso/spool/sci/physics/19025

Internet Message Format | 1992-11-17 | 5.4 KB

Path: sparky!uunet!know!mips2!news.bbn.com!noc.near.net!news.Brown.EDU!qt.cs.utexas.edu!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!news.iastate.edu!pv343f.vincent.iastate.edu!abian
From: [e-mail] (Alexander Abian)
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Re: TIME HAS INERTIA - THE ENVIOUS-DESPONDENT REACTION OF CHASE
Keywords: TIME HAS INERTIA,  i.e., TIME IS MATTER
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: 16 Nov 92 22:18:53 GMT
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail] (USENET News System)
Organization: Iowa State University, Ames IA
Lines: 109





Dear Mr. Chase                                   11-16-92

   In your state of total despondency and jealousy (the reasons for  which
I will explain shortly) in your latest rage of envy you wrote:

              > Abian, you are a blithering fool.

  To that my answer is:

    Scott CHASE  you are a blithering fool yourself and your knowledge of
    Physics is unadulterated beta-sigma and you are an international
    beta-sigma-er!

  By your own words (as shown below) you are fanatically and hysterically
still clinging to the validity of "the local conservation of energy"
Your fanaticism is strictly beta-sigma!  Here are your words:


>Everyone who has studied General Relativity knows full well that
>conservation of energy, though valid locally, is not believed to be
>valid on a cosmological scale.

 I have to tell you that General Relativity is beta-sigma.  It is a
unsubstantiated beta-sigma. A group of hallucinating, self-adoring,
self-massaging,  pseudo-scientists in a total stage of  beta-sigma
delirium have decided (for the  satisfaction of their own sense of
warped depravity) that The Cosmos is a semi-differentiable 4 dimensional
Riemannian manifold. (Do you want to examine me on the definition of
a Differentiable manifold again ? Read my last article on that subject
THE  GIST OF A MANIFOLD).

 I don't believe that the Cosmos is a 4-dimensional Manifold - Riemannian
or non-Riemannian.  A bunch of self-massaging pseudo-scientists (politi-
cians), including Einstein and the like, have indoctrinated you people
and almost hopelessly paralyzed your brains and mentality.  You are rolling
slavishly on your bellies in front of their 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 -dimensional beta-
sigma manifolds !!  What a sham, what a cruel poisoning of minds !  Every
day they feed you with a new portion of beta-sigma, and, you take it wor-
shipingly  and licking their hands.



 So, Scott do not teach me General Relativity - you are still in the
19-th century oblivion  since you still believe in "validity of local
Conservation of Energy".

  Also, do not tell me  and do not beta-sigma me with your following words:


>In other words, everyone but you seems to know that energy is not conserved
>in the Universe according to our best model of how these things work.

  Much before the  "Red Shift notion and articles" which I think contain lots
of beta-sigma, I expressed that  "the Conservation of Energy Principle
should be rejected".

 In this business do not try to teach me the facts of life.  You should
carefully read my postings, study and digest (A1), (A2), (A3), (A4),
(A5) and (A6).  Read them, think about them, come out of the 19-th century
mentality. Do not take the beta-sigma that you are fed by "specialists".


 I will tell you  why are you so upset, enraged and hysterical.
Because, although you people now under the disguise of Red Shift are starting
to believe in something that I much before you people have discovered ,
you still do not know WHY THE  PRINCIPLE OF CONSERVATION OF ENERGY FAILS.
   The only person who answered that question is ME.


(A2)     TIME HAS INERTIA (i.e., TIME IS MATTER)  AND SOME ENERGY
         IS IRRETRIEVABLY DISSIPATED FOR MOVING TIME FORWARD

 Now, Scott Chase, do not come in 9 months pregnant with my (A2) and
tell me  "Abian, everyone but you knew before you, your (A2)".  I will
not be surprised if you or someone else come and tell me that.

   You are jealous and envious that it is  I, Alexander ABIAN  who
finally shook up the entire foundation of Physics and brilliantly
answered and unraveled, one of the greatest mysteries of all time,
THE TIME ITSELF.  Instead of being envious and jealous of me , you
should be eternally greatful that you lived when I lived and that
I am rescuing you from all the 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,... dimensional beta-sigma
of the established academic perversion.  It is time to get rid
of all the myth of Relativistic Physics and accept my revolutionary
ideas and develop them .  I am opening a new era in science and in par-
ticular in Physics. Follow me and you will see the truth !

   With best wishes and regards,
                                            Alexander Abian

P.S.  I see that you are still reading  TIME HAS INERTIA.  The reason is
   obvious - you see content in my postings and not blowing beta-sigma.
   continue reading me , pretty soon you will see the truth and you will
   lecture others on TIME HAS INERTIA. I do deserve a Nobel Prize for (A2).

   Again, with best wishes and regards.




--
   The tendency of maintaining the status-quo, Reaction to provocation and
                The tendency of maintaining again a status-quo.
    TIME HAS INERTIA  and some energy is lost to move Time forward
  E = mcc  (Einstein)    must be replaced by    E = m(0) exp(-At) (Abian)