home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.military
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!psinntp!psinntp!ncrlnk!ciss!law7!military
- From: Josh 'K' Hopkins <jbh55289@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu>
- Subject: Re: Spy Satellites for the UAE?
- Message-ID: <Bxyv60.G09@law7.DaytonOH.NCR.COM>
- Sender: military@law7.DaytonOH.NCR.COM (Sci.Military Login)
- Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
- References: <BxvFLL.90o@law7.DaytonOH.NCR.COM>
- Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 14:06:00 GMT
- Approved: military@law7.daytonoh.ncr.com
- Lines: 34
-
-
- From Josh 'K' Hopkins <jbh55289@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu>
-
- Stephen M Jameson <sjameson@fergie.dnet.ge.com> writes:
-
- >I heard on the news this morning a report that the US is considering selling a
- >"Super-Secret Spy Satellite" to the United Arab Emirates. Does anybody know
- >any more details than this? I am primarily interested in the rationale and
- >logistics for such a sale, as I don't expect details of the satellite itself to
- >be available.
-
- The reason the US is considering it is mainly becaused they were asked. The UAE
- is interested in buying an observing satellite with resolution in the 1-2 meter
- range. While this isn't especially exciting compared to US spysats it is
- substantially better than other commercially available satellites and wouldn't
- be too shabby for a country you don't normally consider a major military or
- space power. The UAE would like to buy the satellite from a US company, but
- should that be impractical, Europe and Russia both have the capabilities
- required to build the hardware.
-
- Just why they want the satellite isn't clear to me, but there has been
- speculation that it would be useful for commercial intelligence, such as
- monitoring activities at oil refineries. The US government can't make up its
- mind on the issue, as one side wants to maintain control over space intelligence
- and the other wants to provide jobs. The current proposal, in which the UAE
- only gets the data from the satellite but doesn't actually operate it may be
- palatable to both sides.
-
-
- --
- Josh Hopkins jbh55289@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu
-
- "Why put off 'til tomorrow what you're never going to do anyway?"
-
-