home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.military
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!rpi!newsserver.pixel.kodak.com!psinntp!psinntp!ncrlnk!ciss!law7!military
- From: mat@mole-end.matawan.nj.us
- Subject: Re: Jutland
- Message-ID: <BxtKIu.221@law7.DaytonOH.NCR.COM>
- Summary: How about more info ...
- Sender: military@law7.DaytonOH.NCR.COM (Sci.Military Login)
- Organization: :
- References: <Bx97JB.27F@law7.DaytonOH.NCR.COM> <BxM62I.580@law7.DaytonOH.NCR.COM>
- Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 17:28:06 GMT
- Approved: military@law7.daytonoh.ncr.com
- Lines: 26
-
-
- From mat@mole-end.matawan.nj.us
-
- In article <BxM62I.580@law7.DaytonOH.NCR.COM>, phs172m@vaxc.cc.monash.edu.au (Stephen Harker) writes:
- > From phs172m@vaxc.cc.monash.edu.au (Stephen Harker)
-
- > The British gunnery was pretty good actually. ... the British
- > [attacked] on a curving course involving high rates of change of bearing
- > and range on their own ships. The Germans were on a stable course. ...
- > the British ... had ...the Argo clock ... to predict the enemy's position
- > given good observations, unfortunately this was not installed and the
- > inferior Dreyer table used. ...
-
- Anyone care to describe these technologies?
-
- > s... The British ships all had, and used, director firing, the
- > Germans did use a better gunnery technique of ladder firing which found the
- > range very quickly. ...
-
- Or these techniques?
- --
- (This man's opinions are his own.)
- From mole-end Mark Terribile
-
- mat@mole-end.matawan.nj.us, Somewhere in Matawan, NJ
-
-