home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.engr.control
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!ames!purdue!yuma!csn!news.den.mmc.com!stote
- From: stote@tomcat.den.mmc.com (M. Stote)
- Subject: Re: Translating from Xanalog to Simulink
- Message-ID: <1992Nov16.185444.25759@den.mmc.com>
- Sender: stote@tomcat (M. Stote)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: tomcat.den.mmc.com
- Organization: Martin Marietta Astronautics Group
- References: <27497@oasys.dt.navy.mil>
- Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 18:54:44 GMT
- Lines: 22
-
- Simulink does have the capability of using a text-based approach to
- inputting parameters in blocks, even to building block diagrams.
-
- One has to just look at the .m file created by Simulink to get an idea
- of the structure.
-
- Specifically for entering parameters in a block, use the function:
- set_param ref: Simulink Manual pg 3-32, 4-131
-
- I'm not sure how useful this will be in your translating from Xanalog to
- Siimulink, but it is certainly extremely useful in doing parametric
- studies.
-
- I whole-heartedly agree with your ocntention on a common structure for blocks
- and remember seeing such a structure proposed in one of the CACSD newsletters.
-
- If anyone at Mathworks is reading this group PLEASE listen to this. Having
- an open interface structure will make it so much easier (ie possible) to
- automate interfaces between various applications
- --
- Mike Stoughton
- stote@den.mmc.com
-