home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!watson.ibm.com
- From: jbs@watson.ibm.com
- Message-ID: <19921123.193150.130@almaden.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Nov 92 21:05:20 EST
- Newsgroups: sci.crypt
- Subject: Government regulation of cryptography
- Lines: 21
-
- I believe much of the discussion of the key registration pro-
- posal has been ill-considered and based on a false understanding of
- what the government's objective is.
- The government's main objective is to forstall a future in
- which common carriers routinely encrypt all traffic in a form the
- government cannot read. Any other objectives are secondary and will be
- sacrificed to preserve the main objective.
- The government is not greatly worried about private individuals
- arranging to use crypto among themselves. The government is well aware
- that, contrary to some statements in this group, effective crypto is
- sufficiently inconvenient that most people will not voluntarily use it.
- This is true even when the hazards of not using it are obvious as the
- government has found in attempting to get its own armed forces to use
- crypto.
- Common carriers are unlikely to voluntarily adopt encryption.
- Hence if crypto proponents wish to defeat the government they should
- press for legislation requiring common carriers to use encryption (or
- alternatively for holding common carriers liable for any damages caused
- by failure to use encrytion). Based on what happened with celluar
- phones prospects for this do not seem great.
- James B. Shearer
-