home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.chem
- Path: sparky!uunet!ornl!rsg1.er.usgs.gov!darwin.sura.net!paladin.american.edu!news.univie.ac.at!hp4at!mcsun!sunic!kth.se!LINK.Physchem.KTH.SE!TOMAS_E
- From: tomas_e@LINK.Physchem.KTH.SE (Tomas Eriksson)
- Subject: Re: Heavy water separation
- Message-ID: <1992Nov15.170803.25188@kth.se>
- Sender: usenet@kth.se (Usenet)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: link.physchem.kth.se
- Reply-To: tomas_e@LINK.Physchem.KTH.SE
- Organization: Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm
- References: <1992Nov11.185537.1705@engage.pko.dec.com>
- Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1992 17:08:03 GMT
- Lines: 48
-
- In article <1992Nov11.185537.1705@engage.pko.dec.com>, moroney@ramblr.enet.dec.com writes:
- >Question on a 'different form' of heavy water:
- >
- >Does H O-18 (water with normal hydrogen but the oxygen-18 isotope) behave
- > 2
- >more like normal water or heavy water in its melting point, boiling point,
- >density, biological effects etc? It has the same molecular weight as
- >D O. How about "superheavy water", D O-18? T O-18 anyone?
- > 2 2 2
-
- When you say "superheavy water", you usally refer to tritium oxide,
- T_{2}O.
-
- Generally, you won't see as dramatic effects changing ^{16}O to some
- other oxygen isotope, as you will upon changing ^1{H} to ^2{H}; in this
- case, the high-school chemistry rule "isotopes of an element are the same
- chemically" actually apply.
-
- Only changing H -> D gives you a 100% increase in mass of that atom,
- with corresponding changes in molecular vibrational frequencies
- involving that atom, which also changes IR spectra of that molecule, and
- so on. And since water is the amazing compound it is (water would
- easily win the contest for "most interesting compound" - even though you
- may get the impression that this presently-fashionable species of soot -
- buckminsterfullerene or whatever - is more interesting), and the H atom
- is involved in so many chemical and physicochemical processes, H -> D
- effects are very interesting and quite noticeable.
-
- Of course, in some properties where the mass of the molecule is an
- important factor, ^{2}H_{2}^{16}O and ^{1}H_{2}^{18}O will show roughly
- the same difference from ^{1}H_{2}^{16}O; but surely a 1 K change in
- boiling point is much less interesting than a, say, factor three
- reduction in a reaction rate of a certain reaction, or a substantial
- shift in IR absorption frequency?
-
- Superheavy water, T_{2}O or ^{3}H_{2}^{16}O, is much less used than
- D_{2}O for two good reasons: it's radioactive, and it's expensive. But
- sure, you'd see the same qualitative effects with tritium as with
- deuterium, with an even higher quantitative deviation.
-
- Tomas
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Tomas Eriksson tomas_e@physchem.kth.se
- Surface Force Group, Department of Physical Chemistry,
- Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
-
- "These latter-day practitioners of surface chemistry reflect a lingering of the
- adventurous spirit of the Enlightment" -- Charles Tanford
-