home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
- Path: sparky!uunet!think.com!sdd.hp.com!news.cs.indiana.edu!nstn.ns.ca!fox!maceache
- From: maceache@fox.nstn.ns.ca (Tim Maceachern)
- Subject: Re: Clemens Market Value (trade with Toronto)
- Message-ID: <1992Nov22.162540.12350@nstn.ns.ca>
- Sender: usenet@nstn.ns.ca (NNTP Entity)
- Organization: NSTN Network Operations Centre, Nova Scotia, Canada
- References: <By2pDs.KFo@cs.dal.ca> <1992Nov21.190438.12406@cs.cornell.edu> <By4KDn.C2p@math.uwaterloo.ca>
- Distribution: na
- Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 16:25:40 GMT
- Lines: 23
-
- fass@math.uwaterloo.ca (The FASS Theatre Company) writes:
-
- >So as I see it the Jays *could* trade
-
- >Delgado, Bell, Duane Ward for Clemens.
-
- >This is arguably the best minor league prospect, a talented, though
- >unproven, outfielder and a premier closer. Is this enough? Too much?
- >what would the Jays have to add? Take away? Please be kind. I'm new at
- >this.|-)
-
- >Lee.
-
-
- Why would you want to trade for Clemens when you can simply sign Cone?
- I won't argue as to whether Clemens or Cone would be the best present
- value. But I don't see why any team would be willing to trade for
- Clemens. (Flame retardent: note that I'm not saying that he is not a
- great player. I have great respect for Clemens. Saw him shut out my
- Jays 2-0 Fenwick opening day a few years ago. Boring game, but great
- pitchers give you a lot of boring games.)
-
- Tim MacEachern
-