home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!noc.near.net!mars.caps.maine.edu!maine.maine.edu!io80861
- Organization: University of Maine System
- Date: Wednesday, 18 Nov 1992 09:11:48 EST
- From: Damon Kiesow <IO80861@MAINE.MAINE.EDU>
- Message-ID: <92323.091148IO80861@MAINE.MAINE.EDU>
- Newsgroups: rec.photo
- Subject: Re: EOS FAQ - Bigger and Better!
- Distribution: world
- References: <1992Nov16.231830.3592@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu>
- <1992Nov17.071145.9207@colorado.edu> <1992Nov17.203027.2128@ucbeh.san.uc.edu>
- Lines: 24
-
- In article <1992Nov17.203027.2128@ucbeh.san.uc.edu>, yuanj@ucbeh.san.uc.edu
- says:
- >
- >In article <1992Nov17.071145.9207@colorado.edu>, panos@burton.cs.colorado.edu
- >(Panos Tsirigotis) writes:
- >> In article <1992Nov16.231830.3592@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu>
- >acs@csri.toronto.edu (Alvin Chia-Hua Shih) writes:
- >>>
- >>>6.7. How can I shoot more than 36 exposures?
- >>>
- >>>It appears that there is no way so far. The camera cannot..............
-
-
- >>>............................What about if you hit EOF with a roll of less
- >>>than 36? Any sprocket hole damage?)
-
-
- I once hit a roll of 24 disguised as a roll of 36 (bulk rolled) on my
- EOS 1. Rewinded normally with no damage but did confuse the hell out
- of me until I opened it up to develop. The EOS 1 doesn't just rely on
- the DX it also watches tension. Of course I have never gotten more
- than 24/36 out of a roll either.
-
- Damon Kiesow / IO80861@Maine / 71131,1635 / 207-581-3059
-