home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #27 / NN_1992_27.iso / spool / rec / photo / 19958 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-11-17  |  954 b 
  1. Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!sgiblab!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!biosci!agate!stanford.edu!leland.Stanford.EDU!prodger
  2. From: prodger@leland.Stanford.EDU (phillip prodger)
  3. Newsgroups: rec.photo
  4. Subject: Re: candid photo lens? is there such a thing?
  5. Message-ID: <1992Nov17.182827.11903@leland.Stanford.EDU>
  6. Date: 17 Nov 92 18:28:27 GMT
  7. References: <16NOV92.20190595@sklib.usask.ca> <raju.721953745@st-lina> <1992Nov17.182014.10522@leland.Stanford.EDU>
  8. Sender: news@leland.Stanford.EDU (Mr News)
  9. Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
  10. Lines: 6
  11.  
  12. In article <1992Nov17.182014.10522@leland.Stanford.EDU> prodger@leland.Stanford.EDU (phillip prodger) writes:
  13. >
  14. >People are far more sensitive to the direction of your eye than the direction
  15. >of your lens.  I guess the public-at-large is conditioned to associate
  16. >photography with a straight TLR or P&S set up.
  17.                              ^^^ Sorry, I mean SLR.
  18.