home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: rec.photo
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!sunic!aun.uninett.no!ugle.unit.no!due.unit.no!nareid
- From: nareid@due.unit.no (Helge Nareid)
- Subject: Re: rec.photo FAQ and answers
- Message-ID: <1992Nov16.154156.3639@ugle.unit.no>
- Sender: news@ugle.unit.no (NetNews Administrator)
- Organization: University of Trondheim, Norway
- References: <1992Nov16.020913.29565@nmsu.edu> <102096@bu.edu>
- Date: Mon, 16 Nov 92 15:41:56 GMT
- Lines: 35
-
- In article <102096@bu.edu>, dtang@bass.bu.edu (yunfei zhang) writes:
- |> > Do I need a 'circular' polarizer, and what is one, anyway?
- |> >
- |> > Circular polarizers are just like regular polarizers, but
- |> > have an additional optical element to stir the light up
- |> > after the filter has done its thing. This stirring keeps
- |> > autofocus mechanisms and some light-metering mechanisms from
- |> > getting confused by polarised light. If the manual says you need
- |> > to use one, you likely do.
- [...]
- |>
- |> I understand the differece between linearly polarized light and
- |> circularly polarized but I have a tough time to understand how
- |> the CP will do the same job as LP without fool the autofocus
- |> system.
- |>
- |> Anybody has a better explanation to satisfy my curiosity? (Thanks)
- |>
- |> DMT
- |>
-
- I'll try...
-
- Basically, the problem is that virtually all autofocus and through-the-lens
- metering systems use some sort of beam-splitter (optical elements which reflect
- a specific percentage of the light and transmit the rest). In general, the
- ratio between reflected and transmitted light is polarization dependent. The
- sensitivity to polarization depends strongly on the type type of beamsplitter
- used and the geometry of the system (look up the Brewster angle in an optics
- textbook if you want an example). In some cameras, linearly polarized light
- can trick the light meter because of this effect.
-
- Hope this helps.
-
- - Helge Nareid
-